Note:
In the following write up, two (or more) different spellings have been
used for certain key words. The word in normal color denotes the usual
spelling in English. The word in an alternate color denotes the
transliteration spelling as per RIT, e.g., Brahmi and braahmee.
|
Indus Script and Telugu |
The history of linguistic scripts in India
followed a totally different line from that of the languages themselves.
Telugu belongs to the Dravidian family of languages. Literate south
Indian languages except Konkani are Dravidian. Most people who speak the
languages belonging to this family now live in southern India. However,
pockets of people belonging to this group also live in several other
parts of the world, e.g., Pakistan, Afghanistan, Nepal, and Central
Asia. It is more or less certain that the Indus seals (hieroglyphic or
not) found in the remains of Mohenjodaro and Harappa represent the
proto-dravidian language. Geographically the range of this language
extended from the Sindh river all the way up to the borders of
Ganga-Yamuna doab spreading over the Saraswati river basin in Pakistan
and India. It flourished for well over a 1000 years from around 3000
BCE. It had a well-developed script. An example of the character set
used by this script is given below. There are more than four hundred
symbols in this script. It is highly likely that these symbols are a
mixture of hieroglyphs, ideograms, syllabic graphs and other such
patterns. So far, the available examples of the script consist of very
short phrases or sentences comprised of 5 to 26 characters. In a recent discovery (May 1999), researchers unearthed at Harappa, what seems to be the earliest known writing in the world -dating from 3500 BCE.
|
There is hardly any direct evidence
referring to the state of this language after 1700 BCE. However, from
indirect evidence and a combination of transformational and
lexico-statistical analyses, we can conclude that this language
eventually blossomed into Northern, Central, and Southern sub-families.
The central Dravidian sub-family evolved into Telugu and several other
tribal languages of central and eastern India. The southern sub family
gave rise to Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Kodagu and Tulu as well as some
other non-literate tribal languages. The monumental Linguistic Survey of
India (pub. 1906) carried out more than a century ago lists many of
these languages. A more recent classification, a list of over 70
languages in the Dravidian family and some relevant statistics can be
found at the ETHNOLOGUE
site. There are several changes in this list compared to the Linguistic
Survey of India (Ed. -G.A. Grierson). For example, Grierson listed the
Savara language under the Munda family, where as the Ethnologue site
places it in the Telugu sub-family. Further research may reveal that
some of these languages are actually dialects of other languages.
Conversely, more languages may be re-classified from existing regional
variants. But it is certain that dozens of languages of south India
belong to the Dravidian family. This root family has most likely
descended from the Saraswati-Sindhu civilization. Thus, the ancient
predecessor to Telugu and other Dravidian languages had a script as
depicted in the Indus seals. In spite of several imaginative attempts,
this script remains undeciphered.
|
{Traditionally,
within south India, the word Dravidian meant Tamilian. The two words
are etymologically related to each other. However since the middle of
the nineteenth century, perhaps because of the lack of a better word,
Dravidian is increasingly being used to denote the commonality in South
Indian roots and culture. This usage was due to Bishop Caldwell who
wrote an influential work on South Indian Languages.}
|
Brahmi Script and Telugu |
For some inexplicable reason, later Indian languages that succeeded the saraswati-siMdhu
proto-dravidian language seem to have suspended the use of formal
script for a long time -perhaps more than fifteen centuries. The arrival
of Aryan tribes into the sub-continent might have triggered this in
some fashion. Most current researchers believe that these Aryan tribes
had migrated from central Asia via the middle-east and Iran. These
tribes too did not employ formal script in India for many centuries
after their arrival. It is interesting to note that since they came via
the middle-east, these Aryan tribes must have had a very clear
understanding of the scripts already in use there for a very long time.
The Sumerian, and other Mesopotamian cultures had thriving
socio-political systems supported by rigorous record keeping. Yet, no
evidence for formal writing had been unearthed in India or Pakistan
between 1700 BCE and fourth century BCE. During this time, Indians
developed a vast amount of philosophical and ritualistic literature.
They also developed a keen sense of phonetics and complicated rules of
grammar and pronunciation. In fact these rules are considered to be
among the most sophisticated ever developed. Contrary to earlier
understanding that these developments are entirely Aryan, both the
Dravidian and Aryan systems seem to have influenced these developments
significantly. It is difficult to imagine the clear establishment of the
alphabet and all the allied rules, the development of huge kingdoms and
enormous armies numbering several hundred thousand troupes without the
help of written record keeping. Researchers are yet to satisfactorily
explain this seeming contradiction. It is said that the tradition of
writing had been revived sometime after the death of Buddha although
early European researchers tended to believe that this revival might
have been around the eighth century before Christ. The catalyst for this
revival seems to be the increased contact with central Asia. Perhaps
the big factor in this is the so-called invasion (of parts of Indus
valley) by Alexander of Macedonia in 326 BCE. He brought with him a
large army as well as a large entourage of courtiers which included
scribes of various hues. The preferred script used by these scribes
seems to be Aramaic. Incidentally, Aramaic became the international
script of that time and even Jesus of Nazareth made use of Aramaic more
than his native Hebrew. These scribes were prized for their skills and
they spread out over a vast area of Asia. They were employed in large
numbers by most of the kingdoms in the middle-east including the
powerful Achaemenid empire. They introduced the Aramaic script to
Indians. This was adopted by the peoples of the northwestern India in
the form of KharOSThee. The Nanda kings
(and Mauryan emperors who succeeded them) at Pataliputra adopted a
script inspired by it for all their official communications. From this
developed the Brahmi script and eventually the modern day Devanagari.
The figures below show the early braahmee script.
|
The Andhra (Saatavaahana) dynasty introduced the braahmee
to the present day Kannada and Telugu regions. The earliest
inscriptions found in the Tamil land belong to more or less the same
period. A number of early Satavahana coins and other remains were found
in Tamil Nadu. It is therefore reasonable to assume that Satavahanas
introduced the script to the Tamil country also. The Satavahanas were,
for some time, vassals of the Mauryan Empire. Mauryan Emperor Asoka the
great (reign: 269-232 BCE) and the rise of Buddhism played stellar roles
in championing this spread of writing. Thus, Telugu and all the other
south Indian languages had developed from the proto-dravidian language
of the Indus valley while their scripts descended from the braahmee.
|
There are direct or indirect references to 'lipi,' liKh,' 'lEKha,' 'liKhita,' etc., in the literature belonging to the periods before this perceived spread of braahmee.
Researchers, especially the western scholars tended to explain these
references as belonging to the art of painting rather than of writing.
In the absence of a convincing proof to the contrary, it may be safe to
assume that the prevailing theories are reasonably representative of
history. The essence of these theories is that, barring their connection
with the Indus culture, existing Indian languages did not have any
formal script before the fourth century BCE. All the current Indian
scripts including the Telugu script have descended from the braahmee which was inspired, at least partly by the Aramaic and other western scripts.
|
{There
are several voices that oppose the main stream theories from
scientific, political, sociological and emotional points of view (e.g., Invasion That Never Was and Myth of the Aryan Invasion).
The gist of these alternate theories is that the Aryans, their culture
and language were all indigenous. Any incidental similarities between
India and the West can be explained away. These voices are yet to gain
any respectability in terms of scientific rigor and completeness of
their arguments although they are becoming increasingly elaborate.}
|
Descent of Telugu Script from Brahmi
|
The chart below outlines the descent of various Indic scripts from the braahmee.
|
Cautionary Note: The figure
indicates the most probable routes for the evolution of modern scripts.
Care must be taken in reading these routes. For example, Telugu script
has been shown as a descendent of "old Kannada" script. It does not in
any way mean that the language (as opposed to the script) has descended
from Kannada. Kannada became a literate language slightly ahead of
Telugu. For example, both Kannada and Telugu had produced poetry during
the eighth century. Kannada writers had also produced full-fledged
literary works in the ninth century. But it was two more centuries
before major poetic works in Telugu became available. That is the reason
for the combined Telugu-Kannada script to have been called as the "old
Kannada." This in turn does not mean that Telugu people were
non-literate during the periods when Kannada and Tamil people were
producing works of literature. Writers in Telugu land had been
continuously engaged in creating literary, religious or philosophical
works in Prakrit and Sanskrit from long before Christ. While the Tamil
and Kannada writers had switched to writing in their local languages in
the first century CE and the eighth century CE respectively, Telugu
writers waited till the 11th century. The major reasons for
this state of affairs include socio-political factors such as royal
patronage and the influence of Buddhism and Jainism, among other things.
|
Further Reading and Acknowledgements
|
Origin of the Indian script systems has
been discussed in great detail by several authors. The above discussion
is confined to outlining the essentials of Telugu script evolution.
|
A very good review of
the current position among leading western scholars regarding the
recent (as opposed to Indus) origin of Indian scripts is given by
Richard Salomon of the University of Washington. Dr. Solomon himself is
currently preparing a scholarly work on the subject. Similarly,
Iravatham Mahadevan's paper "An Encylopaedia of the Indus Script"
published in the International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics
(Trivandrum, Jan. 1997) is a review of Asko Parpola's encyclopedic work
"Deciphering the Indus Script." Mahadevan himself carried out a major
study of the Indus seals and prepared a major study and concordance of
Indus seals and characters.
|
An excellent compilation of the online
resources regarding Indian scripts and related aspects is provided by
Dr. Yashwant Malaiya (Click here). A vast amount of material on the Saraswati-Sindhu civilization is being compiled by Kalyanaraman. An informatively created page on world scripts is maintained by Lawrence Lo. The two Brahmi script gifs are courtesy of Mr. Lo.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment